Hey folks, here's a handy checklist for ensuring you're covering everything you need for the Project. At this point, we should be well into finishing Criterion A.
Also, check out 
this link for a step-by-step guide on what is required. This site is excellent because it shows you real examples of finished documentation for the Project.
 Criterion A: Initial investigation
  | 
Initial investigation | 
A client has been identified. | 
 | 
A problem that requires an IT solution has been identified from the consultation with the client. | 
 | 
The inadequacies of the current system have been explained from the consultation with the client. | 
 | 
The word count for the initial investigation is approximately 250. | 
 | 
The initial investigation is linked to the cover page. | 
 | 
Initial consultation with client | 
Evidence of the consultation with the client has been included. | 
 | 
The evidence of consultation has been linked to the cover page. | 
 | 
 Criterion B: Analysis
  | 
The analysis form has been used. | 
 | 
The solution has been identified. | 
 | 
Requirements specification | 
 | 
The proposed product is realistic in terms of time constraints, resources and the student’s ability to develop it. | 
 | 
Specific performance (success) criteria | 
Specific performance criteria have been drawn up that make it possible to evaluate the success of the product in criterion F. | 
 | 
Justification of the proposed solution | 
 | 
A feasible solution has been identified. | 
 | 
The choice of the solution has been selected that resolves the inadequacies identified in criterion A. | 
 | 
The justification of the proposed solution is approximately 350 words. | 
 | 
 Criterion C: Project schedule
  | 
The project schedule form has been used. | 
 | 
The project schedule refers to the solution identified in criterion B. | 
 | 
The project schedule is updated during the lifetime of the project. | 
 | 
The project schedule provides a realistic plan and timeline for managing the project including the gathering of necessary information, the development of the product and the testing process. | 
 | 
 Criterion D: Product design
  | 
The product design form has been used. | 
 | 
The product design refers to the solution identified in criterion B and the project schedule in criterion C. | 
 | 
The product design includes a range of design levels. | 
 | 
The product design includes a table of assets and a table of techniques required in the development of the product. | 
 | 
The product design identifies at least three advanced techniques that will be used in the development of the product. | 
 | 
The product design is presented in sufficient detail for an IT-literate third party to understand how the product was created. | 
 | 
The test plan proposed addresses the main types of test appropriate to the product and relates to the specific performance criteria identified in criterion B. | 
 | 
There is evidence of agreement with the client to develop the product. | 
 | 
 Criterion E: Product development
  | 
The different techniques used to develop the product have been identified. | 
 | 
The product includes at least three complex techniques identified in criterion D. | 
 | 
The appropriateness of the product structure has been justified. | 
 | 
Screenshots along with justifications have been used to illustrate the choice of the techniques used to develop the product. | 
 | 
All sources have been cited using an appropriate referencing style (for example, Harvard, MLA). | 
 | 
The technical documentation is approximately 1,000 words. | 
 | 
 Criterion F: Product evaluation and future product development
  | 
Feedback from client | 
 | 
Appropriate feedback has been obtained from the client. | 
 | 
The evidence for the consultation to obtain feedback from the client has been linked to the cover page. | 
 | 
Product evaluation | 
 | 
The evaluation refers to the requirement specifications in criterion B and the test plan in criterion D. | 
 | 
The evaluation explicitly refers to the feedback obtained from the client. | 
 | 
Future product development | 
 | 
The recommendations are appropriate to the client for the future development of the product. | 
 | 
The product evaluation and future product development is approximately 400 words. | 
 | 
 Criterion G: Required elements
  | 
Evidence of testing and functionality | 
 | 
The product has sufficient extent to enable its effectiveness and functionality to be evaluated. | 
 | 
The product has been thoroughly tested in a range of situations to ensure that no tests will fail. | 
 | 
The tests used to ensure the functionality correspond to those in the completed test plan. | 
 | 
Cover page | 
 | 
The cover page template has been used. | 
 | 
The student’s details have been added where appropriate. | 
 | 
The cover page has been saved in HTM/HTML format. | 
 | 
File naming and folder structures | 
 | 
One folder called “product” has been created, which holds the product. | 
 | 
The product folder structure is intuitive and allows files to be located easily. | 
 | 
One folder called “documentation” has been created, which holds the eight documentation files: there are no other files or subfolders within this folder. | 
 | 
The documentation is easy to navigate and uses the file names prescribed in the guide. | 
 | 
All links within the project are relative. | 
 | 
There is appropriate use of file names throughout the project. | 
 | 
 
 Final check
  | 
The organization of the project prescribed in the guide has been adhered to. | 
 | 
The project is no more than 2,000 words. | 
 | 
The links within the product and documentation (where appropriate) are relative, allowing portability. | 
 | 
The project has been tested in more than one location under different conditions. | 
 | 
The correct forms have been used for the cover page, analysis, project schedule and product design. | 
 | 
There are no appendices in the project. | 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment